LawHealthTech(@LawHealthTech) 's Twitter Profileg
LawHealthTech

@LawHealthTech

Dr Law, Health and Tech on Substack (https://t.co/HxeQjBMoD8)

ID:1606937000786944002

calendar_today25-12-2022 08:56:57

3,5K Tweets

2,0K Followers

85 Following

LawHealthTech(@LawHealthTech) 's Twitter Profile Photo

This is exactly why career politicians should not be a thing

Your tax dollar (and all that graft they get from lobbyists) is paying for these people to sit and carry on worse than drunk teens in a car park

account_circle
LawHealthTech(@LawHealthTech) 's Twitter Profile Photo

If you are dumb enough to think electrifying cars and larger vehicles is a solution to anything... then it might be time for you to increase your medication

youtube.com/watch?v=NmcvWB…

account_circle
LawHealthTech(@LawHealthTech) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Has to be the weakest science i've seen all week. Mind you, we shouldn't expect anything less

How to observe and re-interpret sometimes incomprehensible animal behaviours through the lens of 'the current thing' & your own corrupt biases

Bret Weinstein Heather E Heying

account_circle
LawHealthTech(@LawHealthTech) 's Twitter Profile Photo

The thing Sarah gets so totally right here is the fact that, just like the covid, climate and Ukraine narratives, if you are saying 'the right things' you can talk until the cows come home

But if you are balanced or, heaven forbid, asking if something isn't right

The thing Sarah gets so totally right here is the fact that, just like the covid, climate and Ukraine narratives, if you are saying 'the right things' you can talk until the cows come home But if you are balanced or, heaven forbid, asking if something isn't right #censored
account_circle
LawHealthTech(@LawHealthTech) 's Twitter Profile Photo

The thing Sarah gets so totally right here is the fact that, just like the covid, climate and Ukraine narratives, if you are saying 'the right things' you can talk until the cows come home

But if you are balanced or, heaven forbid, asking if something isn't right

account_circle
LawHealthTech(@LawHealthTech) 's Twitter Profile Photo

I think this would be a bit of an own goal considering I've read the transcripts from the first trial. Yes, the great unwashed might have no idea about the law of evidence but it would give those of us who do even more ammunition to show how the corrupt pie was made

account_circle
LawHealthTech(@LawHealthTech) 's Twitter Profile Photo

What I find comical & very telling about the warped minds running the NHS is that somehow within one letter they hit every meme and polemic label

They say the jewish Prof Norman Fenton is an antisemetic, Hitler-loving, far right, alt-left anti-vaxx climate and truth denier

account_circle
LawHealthTech(@LawHealthTech) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Shre was lying through her teeth

Premature neonates, especially ones who themselves, or their mother, are poorly at delivery have a high likelihood of dying. They should have expected that at least 2/10 born at 27 weeks were going to die... otherwise they were fooling themselves

account_circle
LawHealthTech(@LawHealthTech) 's Twitter Profile Photo

What annoys me is that the author of this article has clearly been reading my substack. She was told by Prof Burkhard Schafer and, to the best of my knowledge, Richard Gill, that she should interview me yet it appears she read my work and never contacted me

Oh well. Her loss

What annoys me is that the author of this article has clearly been reading my substack. She was told by Prof Burkhard Schafer and, to the best of my knowledge, Richard Gill, that she should interview me yet it appears she read my work and never contacted me Oh well. Her loss
account_circle
LawHealthTech(@LawHealthTech) 's Twitter Profile Photo

In something as serious as a murder trial a judge's instruction should not be telling a jury that they can 'infer' the defendant did it even if there was no evidence to explain what, when or how

Inference instructions like this can only result in false convictions

In something as serious as a murder trial a judge's instruction should not be telling a jury that they can 'infer' the defendant did it even if there was no evidence to explain what, when or how Inference instructions like this can only result in false convictions
account_circle