Ruth Hunt personally told me that if she got to be Stonewall CEO, Stonewall would not take on trans issues. When she got the job, the first thing she did was take on trans issues. And told staff anyone who disagreed could leave. I call that 'No debate'
archive.is/RvZV8

This is sick and disgusting and I want to know why his parents are allowing him to mock female athletes, why his coach is allowing him to cheat, and why these girls' coaches and parents aren't speaking up twitter.com/ReduxxMag/stat…

It's nice you guys put this photo out there so we can keep track of everyone responsible for maintaining this medical experiment, despite all evidence in front of them twitter.com/HealthNS/statu…

Didn't you and Bea Bruske, CLC President both smear the Trucker Convoy as 'white surpremacists' and 'extremists'? How dare you pretend to support the working class. twitter.com/FredHahnCUPE/s…

I see the right side of history crew are now the rewrite side of history.

'That is not up for debate.' We know exactly what went down and history will not be rewritten. You will not get away with walking back what you did and supported, you unethical liars. We know who told the truth and fought and who protected their own ass. twitter.com/KateBMwriting/…

And so I feel very confident saying that Ruth Hunt's description here of Stonewall under her tenure is, let us say, economical with the truth. Stonewall really did refuse to talk to anyone who disagreed with its extreme, authoritarian, anti-science, anti-reality position 4/8

They wouldn't be talking to me, the press officer said, because they didn't accept that there was any conflict. The reply to my polite query was some version of the 'no debate' slogan Stonewall was so fond of at the time. Soon after, I realised Stonewall had blocked me 3/8

I don't remember my exact words, & no longer have access to that email address, but it was a short, friendly email along the lines of many hundreds I've sent to press offices over nearly 2 decades in journalism. The response was ruder than any I had ever previously received 2/8

It was in 2017 that I first realised there was something up between women's rights and transgender activism. I was earlier than some, to notice, later than others. So I dropped a polite email to Stonewall's press office asking for a briefing. 1/8 thetimes.co.uk/article/fe117e…

As this seamless pivot by the former CEO of Stonewall reveals, professional administrators will re-orient themselves seamlessly to wherever they judge power to lie, then instantly forget whatever it was they professed to believe before power shifted

Yeah you're going to have to accept your sex and live a healthy, authentic life twitter.com/No7Sammy/statu…

The only people calling for violence are the trans activists nice try though twitter.com/alienmariii/st…

If you all were happy you wouldn't need all those pharmaceuticals, porn, and surgeries. You wouldn't be living a fantasy life, but an authentic one twitter.com/ozzy_bozzer_/s…

The most perfectly adolescent and imbecilic response from a narcissistic man-child, playing out his harem fantasy on two women and a baby. Of course J.K. Rowling is jealous, and wishes she were a freakazoid instead of a beautiful, powerful successful woman twitter.com/graceelavery/s…

In 2017 I said in summary what Cass says this week. It was rejected as morally wrong by: 1) BBC Radio 4 panelists 2) ⁦⁦Women's Equality Party⁩ 3) my medical students 4) ⁦Quakers in Britain⁩ 5) Others. The ideology had overwhelmed the educated medical class heather-brunskell-evans.co.uk/body-politics/…

Is the 'different opinion' that 'transwomen' are men and that there is no such thing as a 'trans kid' allowed? twitter.com/ohana_annie/st…