Actually, I guess that is what you have done in Supplementary Figure 5E?

One question though Al Haddrell .. I wonder why in the modeling you did not calculate the CO2 concentration as a function of ACH and occupancy, but rather prescribed the CO2 concentration?

Nice paper by Al Haddrell et al.

nature.com/articles/s4146…

But now that he going into modeling as well, we will all have to quit.

We need an atmospheric scientists draft. It would make for compelling tv viewing.

An update ...

Apparently Target’s running mate is the reclusive and rarely-seen Good Policy.

Is the curve starting to bend?

Sure, I would be thrilled about the rise in CO2 and the warming we are seeing ..and excited by the prospect of finally going outdoors in shorts and playing some volleyball, having a picnic, etc… IF we were just coming out of an ice age!

It is settled.. I am voting for Target.

Update. I reached out and NIH director Dr. Monica Bertagnolli has corrected this error.

She says she 'misspoke' and had “meant to say ‘viral components’ rather than ‘live virus.’”

The NIH also confirmed to me such remnants have not yet been shown to correlate with symptoms.

Helpful hints from airborne transmission to climate change..