Justice Kagan has been developing a jurisprudence of federal elections as national elections and limiting the role of the states. This is the best way of understanding her opinion in Chiafalo. Murray's argument is running smack dab against her vision.

Words are truly inadequate to express the full measure of Prof Ogletree. It is hard to believe that one person did so much and touched so many. He really did make the world a better place. We will treasure and honor all that he has bequeathed to us. His work will live on.

The HLS community mourns the passing of Charles Ogletree '78, a tireless advocate for civil rights, equality, human dignity and social justice, and a long-serving faculty member who made a monumental impact on Harvard Law School. We send our condolences to his family and friends.

🔥New pod: I hijacked David Schleicher’s show to host Duncan Kennedy reminiscing about the 1960s and 70s and commenting on CLS v. LPE. Listen and retweet! podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/dig…

Guy-Uriel Charles Tried to distill some of our brief in ELB Post, The Profound Ahistorcism of Moore v. Harper, electionlawblog.org/?p=133544 Guy-Uriel Charles

Prelogar is consistently high-level. So good.

Not sure the distinction that Katyal makes between state constitutions and state statutes is necessary and may be distracting?

Kagan is raising an issue that was the first argument in our brief.

Moore v. Harper oral argument. Roberts raising question we raised in our amicus brief.

Watching #UWNT game v 🇩🇪. Team’s problem is tactical. The center backs are initiating all the offense. More help from the midfield. We need a double pivot with Horan and Sullivan. Smith should play in the middle, Morgan on the right and Pugh on the left.

Justice Kagan is really good at her job.

Really enjoyed partnering with these Democracy & Race Scholars and Angela Liu and her team at Dechert. Our brief provides specific examples of a long history & tradition of state court decisions in the elections clause context. Hope to continue working together in the future.

What is the relationship between law and politics in the Supreme Court? Join us for 'Law and Politics in the Roberts Court' on 9/19 at 12:30 pm ET. Join
Daphna Renan William Baude Amanda Hollis-Brusky Adam Liptak Leah Litman Janai Nelson

hvrdlaw.me/MqNq50KKLSI

Tax law experts have flagged the massive tax break afforded by big donations of appreciated property to dark money groups since at least 2005. Gregg Polsky + Guy-Uriel Charles: scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewconten…

“We are trying to paint a picture of what type of democracy we want and law’s role in facilitating that democracy.”

In his election law course, Guy-Uriel Charles asks students to consider the way things
ought to be, and how to make them happen.

hvrdlaw.me/49ZC50K2kNw

For what it’s worth, unlike b-boy bouiebaisse I’m not sure that abolishing the Electoral College would reduce the incentives for and therefore risks of election mischief and subversion aside from the legal machinery of the Electoral College.

The Penn Program on Regulation’s podcast series, “Race and Regulation,” focuses on how regulatory changes can better promote equal justice, and dignity and respect, for all people. Episodes 1-6 are available now, wherever you get your podcasts. regrev.us/3sSqKH4

Liz Cheney’s matter of fact approach as she’s dropping bombs is underrated and low key devastatingly effective.

After working out FITNESS SF the manager accosted me saying I was a “security threat” because she didn’t recognize me. She then called 2 security guards and 2 armed police officers. She said race had nothing to do with the situation because she has Black kids. #BlackinAmerica