Rapid Motor Adaptation via Population-level Modulation of Cerebellar Error Signals. Nguyen & Stell: biorxiv.org/content/10.110…

Watching the leaked documents story play out at The New York Times is like watching a @[email protected] feed. nytimes.com/live/2023/04/1…

We first described wrongly identified🧬in PMID 24714960 to Oncology Letters Spandidos Publications in Jan 2017 (+follow-up emails), separate image &🧬concerns posted @[email protected] May & September 2022, correction finally published Dec 2022, ~6 years after first contact ☹️ spandidos-publications.com/10.3892/mmr.20…

I'm really appreciating @[email protected] 's changes to their home page. Pointing out Western Blot manipulations is valuable, but it's refreshing to have easy access to journal club-like commentaries the platform was intended for.

Erin O'Shea (HHMI President): [Journal] peer review serves primarily as a business decision and does not best serve science #RecognizingPreprintReview

Preparing a lecture on Irreproducible Research, or How Not to Science... (the unfiltered version)😀

What are you all still doing here?

Day 6 #movember : A full 10% of the people I follow put their Mastodon handles in their twitter name or bio.

fedifinder.glitch.me found them all automatically and then I just imported the CSV and now I am following them on Mastodon too.

Michael Eisen It's only the glamour Tweeters who don't see the problem with the system.

I want you to all take a good goddamn long look at how much WORK goes into post-publication review.

Everyone moving from twitter to mastodon is very likely to fail because it is a collective action problem, benefits depend on others actions.

Here's how it can succeed. It will require your commitment for 1 month to do a few things. Read and retweet if you commit to do them.

Just posted my first @[email protected] comment. Please read this 🧶, it is not solely about a very curious trial but it is also about the importance of pre-publication and post-publication Peer Review.

pubpeer.com/publications/8…

The #1 sleuth of life science data manipulation and imaging fraud, Elisabeth Bik, has analyzed more than 100,000 papers since 2014. She reviews what she's learned and lays out what needs to change
nytimes.com/interactive/20…
New York Times Opinion