'If I had to choose between Christianity and Islam, I'd choose Christianity every single time.'
~ Richard Dawkins

That doesn't mean he likes Christianity. It's still a weird and completely unnecessary false dichotomy that he threw himself into, or allowed himself to be dragged

Religion is the algorithm of human language being used for totalitarian agendas , as a fake data set for mass population mind control & emotional encryption for the duration of their existence!
Totalitarian psychology with zero democratic authority!

Luke I-M Infinituple (🤡/acc) Dave Rowlands Maybe , subconsciously, you are a religious apologist? Numbers favour it as a peer pressure existential.

But lying to infants as basis for a global society (& far worse encrypting their emotions beyond their own natural death)- simply hands their ass to authoritarian messengers

Religions are primarily causal in mental illness imo.

Procrastinating emotional encryption of minors beyond reality - to a data set out of reach & which they are disabled from any interaction with (& reliant on human messengers to ratify) is pure cognitive abuse

You rescinded all my questions & invites plus refuse answers I supply as unrelated (when in fact they're pivotal) for debate so I’m kinda done with you as a worthwhile expenditure of my time.

“Population mind control”
&
“Look at any religious population (& what they claim is true & authoritative) “

-I beginning to view you as a bit of an idiot for your presumptuous reactive replies & dismissal of answers that aren't answers you want!

What are you even talking about?

This statement is an ad hominem & misrepresentation of what I clearly stated.

Which we are, unfortunately!

Are you saying language only results from whatever you mean by ‘being aware of being aware’?

Is it true that fatal diseases kill everyone? Or probabilistic? Is it true that antibiotics & vaccines dramatically reduce probabilistic fatalities? How do humans converge on these conclusions or even know what the mechanisms are to do so?

Clearly the evolution of life as necessarily eating each other to survive has no moral foundation. Is morality not simply a system devised by the most dominant species for their own expanding population to overcome the historical hostilities due non-kin competition?

Godlike qualities are a human fabrication. Why else would life forms need to eat each other to survive? Are they all ‘failed’ attempts at your idealistic projection?

Which god?

One wonders at global deaths due inequality whilst $trillions per year flush away on military gaming addicts?

Scripture is propaganda. Nothing more. It’s not history, it’s not a book of morals, it’s not supernatural. It’s definitely not special

Alan is the go-to ad hominem respondent on the philosophy of anything.

I think that whatever concept Alan has in his head is very different from how he is prepared to explain it to everyone? Otherwise, I am highly certain he is more than capable of being less provocative & more incisively informative!