the youth doesn’t understand

Low-quality shiv.

Interesting question, this. Via our Supreme Court's decision in Anuj Garg, Justice Ginsburg's strict scrutiny standard applies to 'beneficial legislation' passed under Art 15 of the Constitution of India. In Garg, differentiation was b/w genders, in NALSA also b/w sexualities.

I love this paper, and it's a good excuse to finally post my own forthcoming chapter on age and local government law.

papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…

That seniors run the show is something everyone in local gov knows--but not something we talk about in the legal literature.

You know what was a good day?

The Lawrence v Texas hand down. That was a really, really good day

USC goes the opaque “safety concerns” route in cancelling Asna Tabassum’s valedictorian address — without actually overtly censoring it or yanking her status.

Aren’t they clever.

Julian Davis Mortenson I can’t speak to the Leonard Law point but as a USC affiliate, and one who was not happy with this pick of valedictorian, the ‘were scared of violence’ justification really upsets me.

shame

shame, shame, shame

shame on anyone who plays ball with you about anything ever.

shame.

CHRYSALIS/BUTTERFLY SITUATION BRO