the haters said Susan Hall couldn’t do it. and they were correct. honestly great call from the haters

There are two possible explanations for this. Either the Telegraph subs are as stupid as she is, or they despise her as much as we do.

The thing is, it wasn’t appalling expectation management: “the two contests where we can hide behind our local record” is the lowest possible bar.

Quite something to recall that autumn relaunch

Canned hs2 p2 against wishes of Andy Street, Conservative with the biggest personal mandate in the UK.

To replace with promised funding for local projects across English council areas…

- WM looks lost
- half council seats lost

Those local election results in full 😉

What a PR nightmare. Interesting statement though, stating it's the CoOp that insisted on helping the ticket holders, not the owners of the venue.

Some of the finest shade from Steve Bennett Chortle Comedy when, having been hit with the headline 'Seinfeld turns 70 and complains wokeness ruining comedy', the 'extrnal links' at the bottom of the page looks like this.

👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏

I know nothing about Sonic but I love that the nerds are having none of this thread. Clearly some line has been crossed and they are not going to take it lying down. Every single post in the thread has a community note attached

I hope everyone’s having a not great but not terrible 3.6 roentgen day today…

not aardman posting a reel for world penguin day and then following up with an apology post for mistakenly using an image of a ‘chicken’ 💀

Hi Sian, I see you're a fan of harassing trans ppl on the internet.
What is it you always say? Oh yes, trans people are 'psychopathic liars with no concept of reality'.
Which is funny really. Because it seems that you're quite the little liar yourself.
Lets take a look..🧵

I’m on a flight in US and an old lady has caused confusion, hilarity and then amazement as the crew expected her to be an infant. She is actually 101 and the computer can’t handle an age that high so just put her down as a 1 year old on the manifest. She laughed it off. Legend.

Treasury brain is thinking roads, which don't generate income, are worth funding, but public transport links, which do, are not

He hasn't made a spending choice because he hasn't accepted a realistic trade-off.

More for defence means higher borrowing, higher taxes, or serious cuts (not 'civil service efficiencies') elsewhere. He hasn't picked any of them.

Sup Franco Manca Pizza, your Mosely St MCR restaurant is horrifically understaffed. We got seated, waited 15 minutes, then gave up and left without any form of acknowledgment after we’d first arrived. Staff seemed to be doing their best, but you need more of them.

Just astonishing garbage from the government. Claiming they're spending £75bn on defence, while also claiming it will only cost £20bn, by using different baselines.

Alice Through the Looking Glass maths.

Utterly absurd. The entire civil service doesn't cost that much.

Apparently a 0.5% GDP uplift in defence spending is “fully funded” even though there is precisely zero increase in overall spending plans (which already didn’t remotely add up). This is deeply, and depressingly, unserious stuff.

If Labour was talking about abolishing National Insurance while announcing a massive boost in defence spending, they would - rightly - be accused of taking leave of their senses.

The same rules should apply to the Conservatives.

huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/rishi-su…

A sad day for Britain. Passing laws that assert lies the government wish to be true is not something healthy political systems do.

My thoughts are with all those now at risk of deportation to an unsafe country.