profile-img
James Riley

@888riley

Editorial Director at InnovationAus, providing news and commentary on public policy in the tech and innovation sectors. Cycles for sanity :)

calendar_today13-03-2009 04:13:33

2,9K Tweets

3,0K Followers

3,2K Following

James Riley(@888riley) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Mike Cannon-Brookes πŸ‘¨πŸΌβ€πŸ’»πŸ§’πŸ‡¦πŸ‡Ί Caitlin Fitzsimmons πŸ§œβ€β™€οΈ I'm not arguing against the internet, but the negative impacts of monopoly power. And simply making the point that Google does appropriate news content. I agree that the proposed Treasury/ACCC regime is weird, but applaud its intent (re journalism). Don't think it will work.

account_circle
James Riley(@888riley) 's Twitter Profile Photo

James Riley Mike Cannon-Brookes πŸ‘¨πŸΌβ€πŸ’»πŸ§’πŸ‡¦πŸ‡Ί Caitlin Fitzsimmons πŸ§œβ€β™€οΈ How - specifically - does Google appropriate news content?

Here's a screenshot of Google News, and for a search. It displays headlines and then passes the reader to the publication if they click.

Is this appropriation in your view or is there something else I'm missing?

@888riley @mcannonbrookes @niltiac How - specifically - does Google appropriate news content? Here's a screenshot of Google News, and for a search. It displays headlines and then passes the reader to the publication if they click. Is this appropriation in your view or is there something else I'm missing?
account_circle
James Riley(@888riley) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Nick Lothian James Riley Mike Cannon-Brookes πŸ‘¨πŸΌβ€πŸ’»πŸ§’πŸ‡¦πŸ‡Ί It's absolutely true that Google would not have a product if other entities didn't have websites. There's appropriation in the sense that Google's product is literally an index of other people's content. We just have a different to James about whether that's a problem.

account_circle
James Riley(@888riley) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Caitlin Fitzsimmons πŸ§œβ€β™€οΈ Nick Lothian Mike Cannon-Brookes πŸ‘¨πŸΌβ€πŸ’»πŸ§’πŸ‡¦πŸ‡Ί If you can't see there is a problem, you are in the wrong game. I don't claim any easy or obvious way to unpick the downside impact of the model imposed by Google, but to say there is no problem is a bit fatuous. 1/3

account_circle
James Riley(@888riley) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Caitlin Fitzsimmons πŸ§œβ€β™€οΈ Nick Lothian Mike Cannon-Brookes πŸ‘¨πŸΌβ€πŸ’»πŸ§’πŸ‡¦πŸ‡Ί All that's happened - really - is that the ACCC, the media companies and Google/Facebook have said they will sit down and look at the issue. This thread has a tech billionaire crying 'theft!' and an employee of one of the media companies 2/3

account_circle
James Riley(@888riley) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Caitlin Fitzsimmons πŸ§œβ€β™€οΈ Nick Lothian Mike Cannon-Brookes πŸ‘¨πŸΌβ€πŸ’»πŸ§’πŸ‡¦πŸ‡Ί ... saying there is 'no problem!' As someone who has built a small publishing business over five years, I beg to differ on both counts. Monopoly power is a destructive force, not a creative one.

account_circle
James Riley(@888riley) 's Twitter Profile Photo

James Riley Caitlin Fitzsimmons πŸ§œβ€β™€οΈ Nick Lothian Be careful judging others' lived experience.

Or I assume in doing so that you know I spent almost two years writing at a small, tech publication (now bankrupt) & hence am very familiar with the difficulties of small, media businesses in the online age? πŸ€·πŸ»β€β™‚οΈ

@888riley @niltiac @nlothian Be careful judging others' lived experience. Or I assume in doing so that you know I spent almost two years writing at a small, tech publication (now bankrupt) & hence am very familiar with the difficulties of small, media businesses in the online age? πŸ€·πŸ»β€β™‚οΈ
account_circle