Angry Fleas
@AngryFleas
Facts matter. Reality™ always wins.
Blocked by those maintaining safe-space echo chambers.
Unfollowed by those tired of constant "2+2 does indeed equal 4".
ID:1246805790775816194
05-04-2020 14:24:31
295,1K Tweets
3,3K Followers
305 Following
PSA: Election observers generally have the right to be present, but they are not required to be present.
They are free to come and go, but the counting goes on.
#elections101
Chad ™️ ⓟⓐⓜⓙⓞⓨ✌️💙 clean energy burner account Kyle Cheney We are talking about the same thing: Trump had his chances in court to contest the election, and he lost.
He never had evidence to back up his claims.
Writing up your own fake “alternative votes“ is not a legitimate way to challenge an election after losing in court.
SANDRA JOHNSON 2020 stats:
255m over 18 yrs in the US
About 239 million are eligible to vote
About 210 million registered voters
About 160m million voted (66% of **ELIGIBLE**)
About 81m Biden, 74m Trump, and a few mil for other candidates
What's the issue?
The Great Intellectual (Corn/Pop) Steve Vladeck It is legal to ask a winning elector for their vote.
It is not legal for the losing electors to send in their own “alternative votes“ and try to get those counted instead.
Stephen Miller No court has agreed with the “systematically violated election law“ theory.
🇺🇸 Mike Davis 🇺🇸 The Electoral Count Act does not allow losing electors to send in unofficial, uncertified votes to Congress.
Larry Schweikart NO state submitted 'alternative electors' in 2020.
Trump's losing electors fraudulently claimed to be 'duly elected' state electors and submitted false 'votes' to that effect.
Second place does not get to vote in the Electoral College.
Dr. G You call down the Thunder, now you’ve got it Infinity_NYC The losing candidate has _NO_ authority to appoint electors. Only the State can do that (Article II, Section 1, US Constitution).