Third Nations ('the 120') still need to be clear, Is the contention only ideological, so they can claim to keep clear of that axis while getting the best for themselves? Or does it mix in economics, so every +1 in the 'China+1' supply chain is eventually cross-haired too?

Join our team at APSIA ! 🚀

We're seeking a new Executive Director to lead our mission of advancing international understanding, prosperity, peace, and security through education in international affairs. If you're passionate about making a difference, apply now! 📚👩‍🎓🌍…

With disappointment you stand to lose friends and like-minded allies

When you discover how in other disciplines you remain friends

I'm disappointed to see that IMF took the data we shared with them and are now using it without citing us. We produced the statistics they were interested in based on this WP: osf.io/preprints/soca… . Nathan Lane Emily Oehlsen Verónica C Pérez

Sorry but this 'China is humiliating America' narrative is just completely wrong.

Blinken was met by Xi who according to diplomatic protocol doesn't have to meet a Secretary of State. There are instances in previous years of the Chinese president not meeting Secretary of States…

We're sitting in the drawing room of the British High Commissioner.

ISEAS survey implications further drawn out ISEAS - Yusof Ishak Institute sharon seah

We're debating this in Singapore. Of course we want to give credit where credit is due.

Rather than blaming China for deindustrialization, writes Elizabeth O’Brien Ingleson of LSE International History, the US should look at its own domestic policies. bit.ly/49LD1zF

At Brookings and at IMF, I made two observations and a proposal:

Having returned from a whirlwind tour of 9 intense days of meetings in Beijing, reflecting on my discussion with Xi Jinping:

Policymakers within nations don't, as a matter of course, act to promote global prosperity. They, instead, seek to advance only their own individual nation's interests. Sometimes not even that.
dannyquah.github.io/2024/04/06/Wor…
dannyquah.substack.com/p/world-order-…

Wu Xinbo, Danny Quah, Bonnie Glaser / 葛來儀 🇺🇦 & Shin Nakayama join ISEAS - Yusof Ishak Institute with mods Choi S. Kwok & sharon seah for a webinar, 'E-Launch and Discussion of The State of Southeast Asia: 2024 Survey Report'

April 2 @ 9 AM (Singapore)
tinyurl.com/y423hctx

#Geopolitics #ASEAN #policy

'Only one country on the planet systematically passes judgement on the internal affairs of others. Elsewhere, we acknowledge differences with others, and we work out how to deal with them in a way that continues to advance our own interests.'

youtu.be/PIfb7BUiqHY

'The old world is dying and the new one struggles to be born.  Now is the time of monsters.'

crikey.com.au/2024/03/12/nob…

Political shibboleths of the past no guide to US carbon pricing possibility in the present: 5 reasons to embrace carbon pricing today. By Kimberly Clausing , Catherine Wolfram thehill.com/opinion/energy…

The entrenched view that the US will never support a carbon price is misguided, write Kimberly Clausing & Catherine Wolfram. They lay out five key reasons why now is the time for US politicians to embrace it:
thehill.com/opinion/energy…

Excited to see an excerpt from my book, Made in China, in Foreign Policy

Come for the stories of vodka wars and Don King (yes, that Don King), stay for the analysis of how US importers marketed Chinese goods to transform how consumers saw China: from Red China to “Made in China”

If the Nippon Steel deal ends up being blocked, for whatever reason, the case may discourage future investment from allies & partners, including investment in the manufacturing sector, writes Yeo Han-koo.
piie.com/blogs/realtime…