Tim Schwab(@TimothyWSchwab) 's Twitter Profileg
Tim Schwab

@TimothyWSchwab

@nature @nytimes & dozens of other outlets reviewed/recommended "The Bill Gates Problem," now translated/sold on 5 continents
DM's open
[email protected]

ID:722420553601171456

linkhttps://us.macmillan.com/books/9781250291431 calendar_today19-04-2016 13:44:16

5,0K Tweets

9,5K Followers

6,5K Following

Eric Reinhart(@_Eric_Reinhart) 's Twitter Profile Photo

The Gates Foundation funds an enormous proportion of “global health” organizations, academics, and journalists. It has remained absolutely silent on the unfolding genocide. So too have nearly all the US-based recipients of Gates funding, including PIH. Is this simply coincidence?

account_circle
Tim Schwab(@TimothyWSchwab) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Science should always be conducted w/ transparency & integrity--but it seems especially imp when you're talking about vaccines. Why give people a reason to doubt? Why aren't science champions challenging Gates's non-transparent, inappropriate infl over vaccine research/policy?

account_circle
Tim Schwab(@TimothyWSchwab) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Another question: How did Gates Foundation get an advanced copy of this study...& how did Gates get around @thelancet's embargo rules? Gates was promoting specific findings in a press release--a week before pub.

Everything about this study is raising red flags Retraction Watch

account_circle
Tim Schwab(@TimothyWSchwab) 's Twitter Profile Photo

I don't disagree with this....and the deeper I'm looking into @thelancet study, the more ethical questions appear.

There appear to be a major series of undisclosed financial conflicts related to Gates Foundation: stay tuned

account_circle
Tim Schwab(@TimothyWSchwab) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Or when studies that favorably evaluate the behavior of Big Pharma will be discounted because the authors and data are funded by Big Pharma.

Troubling to see people dismiss the importance of transparency, discount how conflicts can introduce potential bias, muddy the waters,

account_circle
Tim Schwab(@TimothyWSchwab) 's Twitter Profile Photo

This is often Gates Foundation's m.o. They fund public health interventions, fund evals of the interventions (and/or fund the data and authors), and even fund newsrooms that reliably amplify the one-sided evals showing Gates's good deeds

There's a word for this: misinformation

account_circle
Tim Schwab(@TimothyWSchwab) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Last week Gates Foundation put out press release trumpeting a yet-to-be-published study showing it saved 154 million lives. Today, the @thelancet publishes the study——and surprise!——Gates's money is everywhere

Are Gates & Lancet doing science...or PR?

gatesfoundation.org/ideas/media-ce…

Last week @gatesfoundation put out press release trumpeting a yet-to-be-published study showing it saved 154 million lives. Today, the @thelancet publishes the study——and surprise!——Gates's money is everywhere Are Gates & Lancet doing science...or PR? gatesfoundation.org/ideas/media-ce…
account_circle
Tim Schwab(@TimothyWSchwab) 's Twitter Profile Photo

NYT is not a particularly good source on this story, given that it competes with NPR on audio/podcasts and given that NYT has its own internal 'crisis' w/ reporters challenging its coverage of Gaza.

Interesting, nevertheless, that this story snowballing

nytimes.com/2024/04/24/bus…

account_circle
Tim Schwab(@TimothyWSchwab) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Strange contradiction in this story that BI doesn't resolve. Microsoft spokesperson says ''Bill is not at Microsoft and not involved here' then later confirms Gates remains a 'technical advisor' to Microsoft.

Serious question for Frank X. Shaw: which is it?

businessinsider.com/bill-gates-sti…

account_circle
Tim Schwab(@TimothyWSchwab) 's Twitter Profile Photo

It's not a secret that @billgates continues to work w/ Microsoft as a technical advisor. But Business Insider presents Gates as the Wizard of Oz, quietly directing Microsoft's AI work.

Unmentioned: Gates also pushing AI 'revolution' via Gates Foundation

businessinsider.com/bill-gates-sti…

account_circle
Tim Schwab(@TimothyWSchwab) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Great story. Association of Health Care Journalists highlights misinformation put out by the IHME, a controversial research body largely funded by Gates Foundation.

'Exaggerating a problem can foster distrust in science, scare people unnecessarily, and lead to bad policymaking.'

healthjournalism.org/blog/2024/04/h…

account_circle
Mary Chris Jaklevic(@mcjaklevic) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Why mislead the public about maternal mortality? A dubious study led to alarming headlines, yet the U.S.'s miserably high should be enough to motivate action, says Boston University School of Public Health Professor Eugene Declercq. Association of Health Care Journalists healthjournalism.org/blog/2024/04/h…

account_circle
Tim Schwab(@TimothyWSchwab) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Sorry, that's VIMC....the vaccine impact modeling consortium, funded by Gates and by (the Gates-funded/led) Gavi.

vaccineimpact.org

Sorry, that's VIMC....the vaccine impact modeling consortium, funded by Gates and by (the Gates-funded/led) Gavi. vaccineimpact.org
account_circle
Tim Schwab(@TimothyWSchwab) 's Twitter Profile Photo

This Vox news story is very similar to press releases put out by Gavi & Gates Foundation, which funds the data sources (VMIC, IHME) used in this study.

Odd to see friendly journalism amplifying this study before it is published or avail for public review
gatesfoundation.org/ideas/media-ce…

account_circle
Edward Snowden(@Snowden) 's Twitter Profile Photo

ok but you're definitely gonna hold off on sending like fifteen billion dollars' worth of weapons to the guys that keep getting caught filling mass graves with kids until an independent international investigation is completed, right?

...right?

account_circle