Esteban CG(@Estebancg) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Food for your rasa after a quantum conference:
'The Reality resonance as compassion sets into motion restorative programs which renliven endarkened consciousness restoring it to its innate enbrightened state' - t.k.

account_circle
jonathan(@jonathandubin) 's Twitter Profile Photo

@collinofzion QC Vinay t.k. this looks great, thank you! coincidentally (or magically???) i just started yesterday seeking out smart takes on magic, and it looks like their latest episode is on magic, woot!

account_circle
John Campbell(@JohnHere2Evolve) 's Twitter Profile Photo

π•Ίπ–ˆπ–ˆπ–šπ–‘π–™π•Ίπ–‹π•»π–Šπ–—π–˜π–”π–“π–†π–‘π–Žπ–™π–ž t.k. I will have to look into this.
Of course the greatest problem is our language which is so incomplete and misleading, trying to explain something we have barely begun to understand.
We have lots of work before us, but that is the point of life, as I see it.

account_circle
Turil Cronburg(@thewiseturtle) 's Twitter Profile Photo

@collinofzion t.k. Descartes is so taken out of context with this quote.

He wasn't saying that thinking made him exist. He was saying that when he observes (has awareness, aka, 'thinking) reality, this proves that 'something exists' (the observer) as the only truth we can ever fully find.

account_circle
Turil Cronburg(@thewiseturtle) 's Twitter Profile Photo

@collinofzion t.k. But, in answer to your question, when you aren't thinking (aware of reality), you might still exist, but you might not, and we can't prove it either way.

We could say you're temporarily not you when you're sleeping (not in REM), for example. Or you're simply 'not all there'.

account_circle
Michael Ashcroft(@m_ashcroft) 's Twitter Profile Photo

@collinofzion t.k. Aye, the thing that is because it thinks is right in its assertion. It doesn't understand the whole story though!

account_circle