Jan Mašek(@JanMasekLab) 's Twitter Profile Photo

And the 2nd SigDD conference is over. 2 day full of great talks and scientific discussion. Special thanks for the brilliant invited talks fromCecilia cellfatelab and Jesse jesse veenvliet, and all the participants for creating so stimulating and friendly atmosphere!

account_circle
Antonio Regalado(@antonioregalado) 's Twitter Profile Photo

jesse veenvliet ISSCR Here is the treatment in the New York Times from 2021. They went with 'mechanical womb.'

I don't think it will be shown that my language is particularly sensational.

@jvveenvliet @ISSCR Here is the treatment in the New York Times from 2021. They went with 'mechanical womb.' 

I don't think it will be shown that my language is particularly sensational.
account_circle
Antonio Regalado(@antonioregalado) 's Twitter Profile Photo

jesse veenvliet ISSCR the paper in question uses the term 'ex utero experimental settings' for the roller bottles. I think 'artificial womb' is a correct translation in layman language.

@jvveenvliet @ISSCR the paper in question uses the term 'ex utero experimental settings' for the roller bottles. I think 'artificial womb' is a correct translation in layman language.
account_circle
jesse veenvliet(@jvveenvliet) 's Twitter Profile Photo

There we go again. Sensationalist journalism with yellow press headlines. Ignoring the call from ISSCR to stop using the term 'synthetic embryo'. For the embryo model field to live up to expectations we need facts, not fiction. Antonio Regalado, you can do much better than this.

account_circle
jesse veenvliet(@jvveenvliet) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Just see this statement in a nature paper: 'Cells were not tested for Mycoplasma nor authenticated as they were purchased less than one year before use'

PSA: I don't care when you purchased... test your cells!

account_circle
Antonio Regalado(@antonioregalado) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Alfonso Martinez Arias jesse veenvliet It is a legitimate exercise to weigh the conjunction of lab-based human embyro models for science, on the one hand, and attempts to make animals, on the other. There's a very good paper by Alfonso Martinez Arias on this topic: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37595564/

account_circle
Alfonso Martinez Arias(@AMartinezArias) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Antonio Regalado Could you tell me where can I find a reference for this statement 'several labs are creating super-realistic synthetic human embryos as well'. This is one of the reasons why jesse veenvliet suggests sensacionalism

account_circle
Alfonso Martinez Arias(@AMartinezArias) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Antonio Regalado jesse veenvliet ISSCR Well, just to clarify. The idea of implanting blastoids is out there and has been tried, but I don't think that it will work through 'empirical' approaches like those described here.

account_circle
Antonio Regalado(@antonioregalado) 's Twitter Profile Photo

jesse veenvliet ISSCR ISSCR statement said the human models aren't synthetic, are not embryos, and can never come to term. This is *exactly* why it was interesting to cover a project to create a birth in a barnyard from a blastoid.

account_circle
Alfonso Martinez Arias(@AMartinezArias) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Antonio Regalado jesse veenvliet They have a different approach, they're not interested in the final product, as those 'cow-boys' but in understanding what's a blastoid & how it relates to a blastocyst. For them, they are the question rather than an ill characterized object to obtain a newborn. They do Science

account_circle