ᴋʟᴀᵾs(@tinyklaus) 's Twitter Profile Photo

So the GoFast was going slow.

Cool.

You still haven’t identified the origin and there are over 800 more cases to solve.

Better get to it.

account_circle
Dr. ZW(@ZombyWoof2022) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Joshua Semeter wants us to believe that the GoFast object is really moving at only 40 mph.

Weird that the fighter pilots heard on the video got so excited about it.👇

account_circle
TheCholla(@the_cholla) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Since GoFast is trendy again, here is where the status of analyses is. When looking at things precisely in 3-D, and accounting for wind speed that night (120 Kts), the object at the displayed range flies at about 100 Knots, or 115 Mph.

Both in Mick West Sitrec and my own model.

Since GoFast is trendy again, here is where the status of analyses is. When looking at things precisely in 3-D, and accounting for wind speed that night (120 Kts), the object at the displayed range flies at about 100 Knots, or 115 Mph.

Both in @MickWest Sitrec and my own model.
account_circle
Christopher K. Mellon(@ChrisKMellon) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Wonderful piece here by Mark Rennenkampf summarizing some of the critical moments from NASA’s recent UAP briefing, including new information about the ‘silver sphere’ UAP. Also, important new insights regarding the “Gimbal” and “GoFast” videos I provided the NYT in 2017.…

account_circle
Mick West(@MickWest) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Today NASA managed to successfully replicate my initial GoFast Analysis from 2019. Peer review at last!

Seriously though, there are some open questions (and unknowns) re wind, but I think this basic analysis is correct. I'll revisit this in Sitrec.

youtube.com/watch?v=PLyEO0…

account_circle
💭 think tank(@528vibes) 's Twitter Profile Photo

I don’t know who needs to hear this but just because the GoFast was going 40MPH against the wind, doesn’t mean it was debunked 😂😂

( Twitter s Sightings Twitter s )

account_circle
TheCholla(@the_cholla) 's Twitter Profile Photo

So long for 'NASA said it's going with the wind at 40mph'. 🤭

By the way, the video does not have all the necessary attributes. Wind is missing, and this is where context (location/time), and 3-D analyses, are CRITICAL.

So long for 'NASA said it's going with the wind at 40mph'. 🤭

By the way, the video does not have all the necessary attributes. Wind is missing, and this is where context (location/time), and 3-D analyses, are CRITICAL.
account_circle
Christopher Sharp(@ChrisUKSharp) 's Twitter Profile Photo

After a team member asserted that the object was travelling at 40 mph I can confirm:

-NASA has no official position on this video
-No one from the study group had access to the raw sensor data
-No one from the study group spoke to witnesses involved, who were trained observers

account_circle
Chris SPITZER(@ChrisSPITZER7) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Since Ryan Graves and other pilots said that RNG (slant range) and Vc (Velocity of closure) are not reliable in the GoFast video. I am gonna do what I should have done since a long time. Test the predictiveness of the accuracy of the algorithm used to compute them. 1/

Since Ryan Graves and other pilots said that RNG (slant range) and Vc (Velocity of closure) are not reliable in the GoFast video. I am gonna do what I should have done since a long time. Test the predictiveness of the accuracy of the algorithm used to compute them. 1/
account_circle