Alison is Tired of Covidiots They could always do the Peter McCullough way: Upload a meta-analysis where you claim the opposite of what the papers conclude to the non-peer-reviewed preprint server medRxiv and declare victory 😂
Effectiveness of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Bivalent Vaccine | medRxiv Prof Peter Hotez MD PhD medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
PsiTechs Out Of Order Scott Gavura 🇺🇦 (also on Mastodon) The first linked study “There was no significant difference in the primary outcome of PCR-confirmed, symptomatic Covid-19 disease (6.2% usual care vs. 5.7% HCQ; risk ratio 0.89 [95% confidence interval 0.54-1.46]), nor evidence of beneficial effects on prevention of 1/2
Max Pichulik Peter Ottavio Brandon Dunn Bill Ackman Robert F. Kennedy Jr Often, experts enlisted are the top researchers in the field. What matters is a system of certified peer reviews. The ignorant use medRxiv to challenge the experts. The bar is very low for talking heads.
Submitted my first medRxiv preprint! In this paper, we introduced new approaches to evaluate LLM responses and showed that #ChatGPT is superior to #Bard in patient related queries. UTSW Anesthesiology International Natural Product Sciences Taskforce Science Communication Digital Health and Patient Safety Platform #preprint #anesthesiology
Bien JM, MD Tim Korevaar ADA DiabetesPro You can find more details in the preprint on medRxiv: doi.org/10.1101/2023.0…
These systematic review papers are all currently under review 🙂
Our paper (joint work with Amy Shakeshaft) on Estimating the impact of transmitted and non-transmitted psychiatric and neurodevelopmental polygenic scores on youth emotional problems is now available as a pre-print on medRxiv medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
Wolfson Centre for Young People's Mental Health