Matt Ridley(@mattwridley) 's Twitter Profileg
Matt Ridley

@mattwridley

Biologist | Author of Red Queen, Genome, Rational Optimist, and Viral: The Search for the #OriginOfCovid: https://t.co/wHGfoouaqx

ID:51837775

linkhttps://mattridley.co.uk/blog calendar_today28-06-2009 20:44:35

35,3K Tweets

128,3K Followers

3,4K Following

Jonathan Jones šŸ¦†(@nmrqip) 's Twitter Profile Photo

ā€œThere is also an obvious deterioration in the quality of research. Too much academic writing has become moralised hectoring, designed more to shame and silence critics than to rationally persuade.ā€ thetimes.co.uk/article/why-amā€¦

account_circle
Libertarian_Virologist(@ban_epp_gofroc) 's Twitter Profile Photo

One of the most absurd false claims of Peter Daszak was when he claimed the Wuhan Institute of Virology did not keep live bats. As he so often does, Daszak offered an absurd excuse when evidence emerged that proved his previous statement false.

One of the most absurd false claims of @PeterDaszak was when he claimed the Wuhan Institute of Virology did not keep live bats. As he so often does, Daszak offered an absurd excuse when evidence emerged that proved his previous statement false.
account_circle
harish seshadri(@harishseshadri2) 's Twitter Profile Photo

'What worked during era of Trump and gullibility of science journalists not used to being misled is NOT going to work now.'

zeynep tufekci has another go at hammering sense into the 'lab leak = conspiracy theory' brigade!

Most people, unlike 'most scientists', will understand her.

'What worked during era of Trump and gullibility of science journalists not used to being misled is NOT going to work now.' @zeynep has another go at hammering sense into the 'lab leak = conspiracy theory' brigade! Most people, unlike 'most scientists', will understand her.
account_circle
Louis R Nemzer(@BiophysicsFL) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Maybe Sharon Lerner and @MaraHvistenl could get Peter Daszak to explain how his March 2022 comments could possibly be consistent with the 2020 email he just released about having 15,000 samples in the WIV freezers and 'could do the full genomes of 700+ CoVs we've identified'

Maybe @fastlerner and @MaraHvistenl could get Peter Daszak to explain how his March 2022 comments could possibly be consistent with the 2020 email he just released about having 15,000 samples in the WIV freezers and 'could do the full genomes of 700+ CoVs we've identified'
account_circle
Marina Medvin šŸ‡ŗšŸ‡ø(@MarinaMedvin) 's Twitter Profile Photo

This is the Palestinianā€œceasefireā€ crowd celebrating Iranā€™s attack on Israel.

They donā€™t want a ceasefire. They want an Islamist victory.

account_circle
Alex Washburne(@WashburneAlex) 's Twitter Profile Photo

It is shocking to learn that Daszak will claim everything is published in public, only to brag in private that he had 15,000 samples in freezers in Wuhan.

The private words of Daszak are more consistent with the volume of biological agents EcoHealth collected & hoarded

account_circle
Ryan Bourne(@MrRBourne) 's Twitter Profile Photo

'Climate change is an existential threat!'

'Wow, I've got great news for you then. Chinese taxpayers are going to subsidise your transition!'

'No! We need green jobs!'

šŸ¤”

account_circle
Tony VanDongen(@tony_vandongen) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Think about this for a second:

There are more coronaviruses in the Wuhan Institute of Virology freezer than in all of Genbank ā€¦

account_circle
Matt Ridley(@mattwridley) 's Twitter Profile Photo

'It turns out that Viscount Ridleyā€™s line of questioning was correct all along. The Uppsala adaptation of Fergusonā€™s model not only projected exaggerated death tolls in Sweden. Fergusonā€™s own projections for Sweden advanced similar numbers, all wildly off the mark from whatā€¦

account_circle
Alex Washburne(@WashburneAlex) 's Twitter Profile Photo

From Daszak's duplicity and Morens' scheming to Fauci's role in damage control across the board, we're slowly learning these key players did exactly what lab origin theory has always hypothesized they did.

Obstruct investigations into research they funded & conducted.

account_circle
Max Roser(@MaxCRoser) 's Twitter Profile Photo

A very positive development in Europe and I don't think this has been reported much in the media during the last few decades.

The suicide rates among young people declined in many European countries.

A very positive development in Europe and I don't think this has been reported much in the media during the last few decades. The suicide rates among young people declined in many European countries.
account_circle
Libertarian_Virologist(@ban_epp_gofroc) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Ok Prof Gavin Yamey @gavinyamey.bsky.social hereā€™s another chance for you to denounce Angela Rasmussen for calling Alina Chan a ā€œmanipulative conspiracistā€ and mediocrity. Very easy but you just canā€™t do it, because youā€™ve got a double standard.

Ok @GYamey hereā€™s another chance for you to denounce Angela Rasmussen for calling Alina Chan a ā€œmanipulative conspiracistā€ and mediocrity. Very easy but you just canā€™t do it, because youā€™ve got a double standard.
account_circle
Holtz(@Biorealism) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Some examples of abuse/harassment of Dr Alina Chan. The one on the left from a science blogger who has interviewed Kristian Andersen and Eddie Holmes on his podcast, on the left an assistant biology prof and author of 'Virology'.

Some examples of abuse/harassment of Dr Alina Chan. The one on the left from a science blogger who has interviewed Kristian Andersen and Eddie Holmes on his podcast, on the left an assistant biology prof and author of 'Virology'.
account_circle
Matt Ridley(@mattwridley) 's Twitter Profile Photo

'Even while remaining silent you should be documenting this things for potential future use and in your own defense and for history.

Tony is fully aware I think and is I am told involved in some sort of damage control.'

Truly outrageous.

account_circle
Louis R Nemzer(@BiophysicsFL) 's Twitter Profile Photo

If you are writing a whole article about

(1) how you never fully ruled out a laboratory origin
(2) were always upfront about your doubts
(3) were not misleading by omission

Don't misleadingly omit 'we do not believe that any type of laboratory-based scenario is plausible.'

If you are writing a whole article about (1) how you never fully ruled out a laboratory origin (2) were always upfront about your doubts (3) were not misleading by omission Don't misleadingly omit 'we do not believe that any type of laboratory-based scenario is plausible.'
account_circle