α’β‰‘π–‹π–”π–—π–’π–Šπ–‰ π•―π–Žπ–˜π–ˆπ–Žπ–•π–‘π–Š - Baconist(@ReformedBacon) 's Twitter Profile Photo

EHzMinistry Spencer Smith πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈπŸ‡°πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡©πŸ‡΄ They weren’t ignorant. You’ve completely misrepresented what the word of God says and missed it completely. Read your Bible, sir. God is sovereign, yet man is still responsible for his choices. Compatibilism. Unless you believe in Jesus as Lord and Savior, you have no hope.

@EHzMinistry @BroSpencer They weren’t ignorant. You’ve completely misrepresented what the word of God says and missed it completely.  Read your Bible, sir.  God is sovereign, yet man is still responsible for his choices.  Compatibilism.  Unless you believe in Jesus as Lord and Savior, you have no hope.
account_circle
John Shepard(@John_R_Shepard) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Michael Shermer Determinism, including compatibilism, is a self-contradiction.

Those claiming that we are determined are implicitly claiming that they cannot help it that they 'think' that we are determined.

account_circle
chronoblip(@chronoblip) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Jordan Paterson BannedbyDrOakley1689 I don't have to convince you to 'disprove compatibilism', or merely undermine the philosophical sophistry.

I don't have the burden of proof to show how compatibilism is different from 'hard determinism'.

Your incompetence and demeanor will earn you many difficulties in life.

@JordanP00238280 @bannedby I don't have to convince you to 'disprove compatibilism', or merely undermine the philosophical sophistry.

I don't have the burden of proof to show how compatibilism is different from 'hard determinism'.

Your incompetence and demeanor will earn you many difficulties in life.
account_circle
BannedbyDrOakley1689(@bannedby) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Imagine reading Calvin and thinking he was in any way the married bachelor called 'compatibilism'. George Bryson hit on the head: I've met many hypo-Calvinists, but extremely few hyper-Calvinists. Internet Calvinists would be shocked if they ever bothered to read John Calvin.

Imagine reading Calvin and thinking he was in any way the married bachelor called 'compatibilism'.  George Bryson hit on the head: I've met many hypo-Calvinists, but extremely few hyper-Calvinists. Internet Calvinists would be shocked if they ever bothered to read John Calvin.
account_circle
BannedbyDrOakley1689(@bannedby) 's Twitter Profile Photo

This person, who is not a Molinist, RIGHTLY describes Molinism as a LIBERTARIAN FREE WILL OPPOSED to compatibilism. Because libertarain free will is OPPOSED to determinism in any form other than the SELF-determinism of the agent whose un-caused free wlll finds source in him.

This person, who is not a Molinist, RIGHTLY describes Molinism as a LIBERTARIAN FREE WILL OPPOSED to compatibilism.  Because libertarain free will is OPPOSED to determinism in any form other than the SELF-determinism of the agent whose un-caused free wlll finds source in him.
account_circle
BannedbyDrOakley1689(@bannedby) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Now compare that to compatiblism's claim. This is why every time I asked Jordan about who determined 'his' choices, 'his' acts, 'his' desires, he refused to answer & instead put up a ludicrous 'invalid question' response. There is NO free will in compatibilism.

Now compare that to compatiblism's claim.  This is why every time I asked Jordan about who determined 'his' choices, 'his' acts, 'his' desires, he refused to answer & instead put up a ludicrous 'invalid question' response. There is NO free will in compatibilism.
account_circle
Lainlain(@3nDLEGEND) 's Twitter Profile Photo

God is all powerful and He has the right to impose His will over anyone He wants to. So saying God 'violated' Abimelech's free will is... strange.
God did not 'violate' his free will, as Abimelech's free will is subject to God's.
(I'm not advocating compatibilism)

account_circle
Kyle Pierce(@KylePierce96) 's Twitter Profile Photo

S. Goblin Turretin And who determines the secondary causes to take place? Who determines the will to only be such that it couldn't have done otherwise? Compatibilism adds an extra step, but is no less deterministic than hyper calvinism.

@goblin_turretin And who determines the secondary causes to take place? Who determines the will to only be such that it couldn't have done otherwise? Compatibilism adds an extra step, but is no less deterministic than hyper calvinism.
account_circle
essentialsalts(@untimelysalts) 's Twitter Profile Photo

I think the psychological impulse to take a stance such as, for example, compatibilism could be called 'secret third thing syndrome'.

You can't just give a 'yes' or 'no'... you have to argue for a secret third thing. You want to show how smart you are.

account_circle
Mugees UL Kaisar(@flyyfishing) 's Twitter Profile Photo

So, both human responsibility as well as Divine omnipotence are maintained; but the question is, is human iraada itself a product of underlying biology which in turn is effectuated by Divine will, then how come there can be any compatibilism in principle?

account_circle
Rex Featherstone(@RexFpsych) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Caitlin Idk that it can all be reduced to genetics, but decisions are ultimately based on preferences, which cannot be freely chosen, as Alex O'Connor discusses in this video. youtube.com/watch?v=Dqj32j…

account_circle