This one is evergreen.

PapersOfTheDay

twitter.com/dkupiecki/stat…
[twitter.com/_everythingism…]
twitter.com/SaskiaPopescu/…

'Expert credibility in climate change'
doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1…

'Consensus on consensus: a [...]'
iopscience.iop.org/article/10.108…

'Consensus revisited: quantifying [...]'
iopscience.iop.org/article/10.108…

BONUS Chris Martz Chris Colose Martz is just repeating the usual denialist fabrications about Stein et al. 2017.

I doubt he's even read the paper, beyond posting the image he likely got from denialist blogs like NoTricksZone.

twitter.com/AtomsksSanakan…
twitter.com/AtomsksSanakan…

wattsupwiththat.com/2018/02/22/sci…

Friends of Science James West CLINTEL.ORG Judith Curry Marcel Crok Andy May Utter rubbish with a similar level of misrepresentation of the scientific literature as clintel.
I will just show a quick comparison between IPCC AR5 temperature projections & Vahrenholt's prediction from the neglected Sun text. Why would you be still promoting this, is beyond me

The hypocrisy is real with Paul Thacker (in his role as the supreme arbiter of how a physician is defined).

He claims only 'licensed' physicians may use the title physician.

In a tweet from 2021, Thacker refers to Meredith Wadman, an unlicensed physician, as a 'physician'.

BlasphemousBanana Bolivershagna2 Chamanit Andy. ✝️🇬🇧 A Devoted Yogi science.nasa.gov/earth/climate-…
twitter.com/ClimateOfGavin…

Gavin Schmidt's update of that CMIP3 comparison through 2023:

realclimate.org/index.php/clim…

el Jefe Atomsk's Sanakan Gavin Schmidt Ginger Zee United Nations Dan Peck

Unlike stations on land, there is a substantial net effect of the bias adjustments applied to ocean measurements to correct for changing ocean methodology.

Those changes are large prior to 1940, but the net effect of ocean bias corrections is to reduce the total global warming.

Sometimes, people try to argue that the global warming signal is an artifact of the bias adjustments & other quality control processes applied to weather station data.

That is easily shown to be untrue. The net effect of the adjustments on the global land average is very small.

Libertarian_Virologist joseph osmundson (all pronouns) We've covered this before; you don't understand of logical fallacies.

It's not fallacious to rely on experts with a track record of being right on topics in their field of expertise.
Similarly so for not relying on non-experts with a poor track record.

iep.utm.edu/fallacy/#Appea…

zeynep tufekci Atomsk's Sanakan Libertarian_Virologist Martin W Gigi Gronvall Respectfully, I feel very disturbed indeed that the one of the main faces of the lab leak theory is this guy—he has a huge following, & of course a book on lab leak

Personally, I find this kind of stuff repulsive & dangerous

I absolutely do think we should call it out

zeynep tufekci Tom Wallach, MD Prof Gavin Yamey @gavinyamey.bsky.social Atomsk's Sanakan Libertarian_Virologist Martin W Oh my.I happen to know a bit about that story (see my linked 2015 paper “The Reemergent 1977 H1N1 Strain and the Gain-of-Function Debate”) and 1. Scientists are not a monolith 2. It took longer to figure out 3. Things were geopolitically different.

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26286690/